Resources
Resources
Case Law Update September 2026
Village Community Dev. Dist./PGCS v. Illeck, ___So.3d ___ (Fla 1st DCA 9/23/26) Heart Lung Statute The firefighter/claimant developed disabling heart conditions of supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) and atrial tachycardia (AT) from an unknown source. The medical opinions agreed the conditions constituted a “heart disease” of the heart’s electrical system, but that the condition did not meet the definition of “heart disease” in the 2023 Harlem case. The JCC ruled for the claimant, in part citing numerous prior DCA cases which found... View More
Case Law Update July 2026
Bouayad v. Normandy Ins. Co., et al,___So.3d___(Fla. 7/9/26) Arising Out Of/Workplace Assaults Bill Rogner The claimant was GM of a car rental business located in a hotel near Orlando Int’l Airport. He was shot several times in a dimly lit outdoor walkway by an unknown assailant. Thereafter, he stated to a guest that “Robert did this.” Although evidence suggested the assailant might be Robert Aponte, who had a vendetta against the claimant’s son, no concrete evidence existed that the assailant... View More
Case Law Update August 2026
Fish v. Extreme Enterprises/AmTrust,___ So.3d___ (Fla.1st DCA 8/26/26) Reimbursement of Guardianship Fees/Costs The DCA reversed the JCC’s order denying reimbursement of guardianship expenses. The guardian/mother of the injured worker (who suffered a traumatic brain injury) retained counsel for W/C benefits. Counsel filed PFBs and sought assistance from the E/C with guardianship proceedings, which the E/C denied. The claimant’s mother was ultimately appointed as the guardian and incurred expenses related to the guardianship process of over $2,428.09 in costs and $10,500.00... View More
Case Law Update June 2026
As of 6-15-26 Koren v. City of Kissimmee/PGCS, ___So.3d___(Fla 1st DCA 6/10/26) Compensability / Burden of Proof/120 Day Rule The opinion is short on facts and indicates only that the DCA affirmed the denial of psychiatric treatment, rejecting the claimant’s argument that the City waived its defenses under F.S. s. 440.20(4) and that he improperly shifted the burden of proof to the claimant. The ruling was affirmed based on the fact the claimant failed to challenge an alternative basis for... View More
Case Law Update May 2026
As of 5-15-26 Leighton v. Kratos Logistics, LLC/Ascendant Claims Svcs, (Fla. 1st DCA 5/6/2026) Statute of Limitations The DCA reversed the JCC’s finding that the claimant’s PFB was time-barred. The claimant’s DOA was 2/9/22. The final indemnity payment was 6/29/22 and the last visit with an authorized doctor was 8/1/22. However, that bill was paid on 5/9/23. F.S. s. 440.19(2) states that the two-year period is tolled when “…[p]ayment of any indemnity benefit or the furnishing of remedial treatment, care, or... View More